Mirror universes’ might look and behave like ours!
10 November 2015, Nirapad News: What’s the difference between matter and antimatter? Sometimes nothing, a new study finds.
Scientists at Brookhaven National Laboratory’s Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) discovered that antimatter protons, called antiprotons, act just like their ordinary-matter cousins when they are close enough to interact via the so-called strong nuclear force, which binds protons and neutrons together into atomic nuclei.
Antimatter is essentially the opposite of matter, in which the subatomic particles (protons and electrons) of antimatter have charges opposite to those of ordinary matter. In an ordinary block of stuff, for instance, the protons are positively charged, and the electrons carry negative charges. In antimatter, the antiprotons are negatively charged, while the antielectrons (called positrons) are positively charged. When antimatter and matter touch, they annihilate each other and produce energy in the form of gamma radiation.
One of the most puzzling mysteries in physics is why the universe has more matter than antimatter. Most theories describing the origins of the universe suggest there should have been an equal amount of matter and antimatter created 13.5 billion years ago during the Big Bang. If that had happened, the world as we know it wouldn’t exist. Instead, the whole universe would be filled with radiation because all the matter and antimatter would have been annihilated. But for some unknown reason, scientists have said, there was a tiny bit more matter than antimatter left over after the Big Bang, so after the initial annihilation, the leftover matter became all the things we see in the universe now.
“This is an unresolved puzzle,” Aihong Tang, a Brookhaven physicist who worked on the new experiment, told Live Science. “If antiprotons interact differently, [that] could be a factor that needs to be taken into account.”
To study these interactions, physicists look for differences in the way antimatter and matter behave, using particle accelerators like the RHIC to make antimatter. If matter and antimatter behave differently, then that could offer some insight into why matter dominates the universe. (Astronomers have searched for regions of the universe that may be dominated by antimatter left over from the early universe; if they exist, the boundaries between matter-dominated regions and antimatter regions would create gamma-rays. Thus far, though, observations made by NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory and Compton Gamma Ray Observatory seem to rule out that possibility.)
According to a theory called charge-parity (CP) symmetry, antimatter should look just like matter — a block of anti-iron or cloud of antihydrogen should behave the same way as its matter counterpart. Violations of that symmetry would mean that isn’t the case. The RHIC experiment shows that, at least for the proton pairs, though, there isn’t any charge-parity violation. This means that the phemomenon that made matter into the dominant form of stuff in the universe, probably wasn’t some property of the antiproton interactions, Tang said.